Skip to content
SoftSelect

Asana

Work management for cross-team projects

3.6(5)
  • Founded in 2008
  • Headquarters: United States
  • GDPR
  • Free tier
  • SSO
Visit websiteCompare
Read reviews

At a glance

  • Starting priceFree plan
  • DeploymentCloud
  • GDPR / RODOVendor states compliance
  • Support in PolishNot available

Overview

Task and project tracking with list, board, timeline and portfolio views for larger teams.

Key facts

Pricing and trials

Starting price
11 EUR/month
Free tier
Yes
Free trial
Yes

Security and compliance

GDPR compliant
Yes
Data residency
European Union
Security certifications
ISO 27001 and SOC 2

Polish market

Polish interface
No
Polish-language support
No
KSeF ready
No

Platform and integrations

Deployment
Cloud
Single sign-on
Yes
Public API
Yes

Facts imported from public sources. Vendors can claim this listing and correct them.

From the vendor

Written and maintained by Asana. Everything above is our own editorial data.

One task, many views

Asana’s core idea is that a task exists once and appears wherever it is needed — in a list, on a board, on a timeline, in a calendar, in a portfolio roll-up. Nobody has to maintain a second copy of the plan for the status meeting, which is where most project trackers quietly fail.

It suits cross-functional work: marketing campaigns, launches, onboarding programmes, anything where the dependency runs between teams rather than inside one. Engineering teams that want issues, branches and sprints usually stay in a developer-specific tool and connect it instead.

How teams set it up

Placeholder footage — replaced when the vendor claims this listing.

  • List, board, timeline, calendar

    Four views of the same tasks. Switching view does not duplicate anything.

  • Dependencies

    Mark what blocks what; the timeline shifts and the owner is notified when a date moves.

  • Forms and intake

    Requests arrive as structured tasks in the right project instead of as email.

  • Rules

    No-code automation for assignment, status changes and hand-offs between teams.

  • Portfolios and goals

    Roll several projects into one status view and link them to the goal they serve.

  • Integrations

    Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Jira and a documented API.

Clarity of plan, purpose and responsibility — the point of the tool is that nobody has to ask who is doing what by when.
Asana · the vendor’s own positioning

Alternatives

Products in the same category that overlap on the facts we track. Ranked by similarity, then by review weight.

  • monday.com

    Configurable work OS with boards and automations

    4.3(3)
    Compare

  • ClickUp

    All-in-one project and docs workspace

    3.3(6)
    Compare

  • Varis

    Varis is a German-language, AI-driven project management system built specifically for agencies with 10–50 employees, and its pitch is that it automates roughly

    No reviews yetCompare

Is Asana yours?

This listing is unclaimed. Claim it to correct the facts, add screenshots and video, restructure the page, and reply to reviews.

Claim this listing

Reviews

How we verify reviewsWrite a review
3.6
3.6

Based on 5 reviews · 2 LinkedIn-verified

  • 52
  • 40
  • 32
  • 21
  • 10

By aspect

Ease of use
3.4
Features
3.4
Support
3.8
Value for money
3.2

  • Works, but we outgrew it

    [Sample] Sample Reviewer E · IT Administrator · 1000+ employees

    3.0
    Email verifiedENAug 27, 2026
    Pros
    Straightforward for a small team.
    Cons
    Hit clear limits once we passed about thirty users.
    14 people found this helpful

  • Rozwiązało problem, dla którego je kupiliśmy

    [Sample] Sample Reviewer D · Finance Lead · 201–1000 employees

    5.0
    Email verifiedPLAug 27, 2026
    Pros
    Szybkie wdrożenie, zespół przyswoił je bez większych szkoleń.
    Cons
    Raportowanie jest uboższe, niż sugerują materiały marketingowe.
    11 people found this helpful

  • Support was the sticking point

    [Sample] Sample Reviewer C · Founder · Self-employed

    2.0
    Email verifiedENAug 27, 2026
    Pros
    The core product does what it says.
    Cons
    Slow responses on anything beyond the basics, and no local-language help.
    8 people found this helpful

  • Works, but we outgrew it

    [Sample] Sample Reviewer B · Operations Manager · 51–200 employees

    3.0
    LinkedIn verifiedENAug 27, 2026
    Pros
    Straightforward for a small team.
    Cons
    Hit clear limits once we passed about thirty users.
    5 people found this helpful

  • Rozwiązało problem, dla którego je kupiliśmy

    [Sample] Sample Reviewer A · Head of Sales · 11–50 employees

    5.0
    Role verifiedPLAug 27, 2026
    Pros
    Szybkie wdrożenie, zespół przyswoił je bez większych szkoleń.
    Cons
    Raportowanie jest uboższe, niż sugerują materiały marketingowe.
    2 people found this helpful